In case you’ve been blissfully unaware of the storm brewing online, the latest film adaptation of Wuthering Heights (2026), directed by Emerald Fennell of Saltburn (2023) fame, is slated for release on Valentine’s Day 2026, and it’s already sparked plenty of controversy. Fans of the novel have taken issue with Margot Robbie (Catherine Earnshaw) being ‘too old’ to play a nineteen-year-old, voiced concerns that Fennell will oversaturate the film with explicit sexual content given her Saltburn-shadowed reputation, and even questioned Charli XCX’s involvement in the score. (...)
Historically, Wuthering Heights has enjoyed considerable success on screen. The most infamous adaptation is arguably the 1939 Academy Award–winning film starring Merle Oberon and Laurence Olivier, while the 1992 version featuring Juliette Binoche and Ralph Fiennes, in his film debut, also remains well known. But to appreciate the novel fully, we have to return to its origins.
In 1847, before the tragic series of Brontë family deaths, Emily Brontë published Wuthering Heights under the pseudonym Ellis Bell. The novel received a mixed critical response, including disapproval from her own sister, Charlotte Brontë, who dismissed it as the work of a 'wild' younger sibling, unable to recognise its beauty. Following the sisters’ deaths, however, the novel settled into its now-cemented status as a literary classic.
Its iconic, windswept West Yorkshire setting, a landscape that mirrors Cathy and Heathcliff’s untameable natures, the nuanced framing of Nelly Dean, and the intricate multi-generational family saga are just a few of the qualities that make the novel so enduring. They’re also why I return to it time and time again, especially at this time of year, something I’ve yet to experience with any of its adaptations. And, notably, I have never seen a film give Nelly Dean (our partial narrator) the importance she deserves. (Millie Hicks and Betsan Branson Wiliam)
0 comments:
Post a Comment