Let’s reach into our bag of words and see what we can find.
Engaging. Sure, but we can do better.
Enthralling. Yes, absolutely. But still not quite right.
Mesmerizing. Definitely. But what about …
Spellbinding. That’s it!
Spellbinding, as in — according to Merriam-Webster — “holding the attention as if by a spell.”
But it wasn’t the spirits of Thornfield Hall that held the audience in its binding grip, but rather the talent and delivery of the entire cast, crew and production team of “Jane Eyre,” the musical drama presented in conjunction with the 64th annual Schmeckfest last week.
The musical adaptation by Paul Gordon and John Cairo of the 1847 novel by English author Charlotte Brontë — “Jane Eyre: An Autobiography” — took the Schmeckfest stage Thursday, Friday and Saturday, April 3, 4 and 5 under the leadership of first-time director Jill Hofer, and boy did it deliver.
Was it the most dazzling of Schmeckfest musicals? Not even close.
Was it the most delightful of Schmeckfest musicals? Another hard no.
Was it the most enjoyable of Schmeckfest musicals? Define enjoyable.
But what unfolded beneath that familiar proscenium arch in Freeman Academy’s 75-year-old Pioneer Hall is one of the most talent-filled display of musical excellence we have seen since “The Red Mill” kicked off the annual tradition of Schmeckfest stage productions in 1967.
Folks were visibly moved in the moments following the opening-night production on Thursday, and on both Friday and Saturday, through the scent of the foods that have made Freeman’s big little festival famous and the sweet camaraderie that keeps people coming back for more, I heard several say it may have been one of the best Schmeckfest musicals they have ever seen.
That’s a stunning and somewhat unexpected claim given the uphill battle “Jane Eyre” was facing since the moment it was announced as the 2025 Schmeckfest musical last July. It was and is, after all, a relatively unknown musical with a story that is thick with nuance, complexity and heavy undertones — a far cry from the heartwarming and inspiring rhythms of the likes of “Oh What a Beautiful mornin” and “Seventy-Six Trombones” that fill peoples cups with idealistic (and oft unrealistic) imagery and optimism.
“Jane Eyre” is a different kind of show entirely, and hats off to Jill Hofer, not only for taking it on, but also for having whole-hearted faith that it would fit perfectly into Schmeckfest’s musical cannon and be something that people would be talking about — for all the right reasons.
As I took in the Thursday night performance halfway back in a three-fourths filled house, not only did I observe the outstanding sounds and sights of the performance, but also how the audience was reacting as the story unfolded — as Jane found her way from childhood abuse in the Gateshead Hall and Lowood School to newfound optimism in Thornfield Hall to, finally, redemption through faith and love. And, as I looked around, I was surprised by what I noticed.
The house was still. Quiet. Locked in. There was no applause following the beautiful “In the Light of a Virgin Morning” sung by Clara Beseman and Kelsey Pidde, playing the parts of Jane and another would-be love interest in Thornfield Hall, Blanche Ingram. Why? Because, so engaged was the audience that it had the collective sense to stay in the mood without the clatter of clapping breaking it. I’ve always said that, in theater, silence can be loudest of all.
There was an audible gasp midway through Act 2, when Edward Fairfax Rochester, the owner and master of Thornfield Hall played by Elliott Graber, admits at his wedding ceremony with Jane that he is already married.
And it didn’t take but a few seconds after the curtain call began that the audience was standing in overt and enthusiastic approval of what they had just witnessed, the 10:10 p.m. hour be damned.
I looked over at Stacey.
“Phenomenal,” she told me, brushing aside any skepticism she may have had given the show’s heavy mood and unfamiliar score. “Maybe the best I’ve seen.”
I have thought long and hard about how the audience reacted that Thursday night, and in the nights that followed, and I believe the positive response was for two reasons.
1. For most, because this was an unfamiliar show with a layered storyline, they were forced to pay attention or get lost along the way.
2. Paying attention was easy because it was just so well done.
And, in those two things, a powerful connection — a spiritual journey — was formed in a gymnasium-turned-theater, the unlikeliest of spaces, a surprise to behold. (Jeremy Waltner)
0 comments:
Post a Comment