Podcasts

  • S2 E1: With... Jenny Mitchell - Welcome back to Behind the Glass with this early-release first episode of series 2 ! Sam and new co-host Connie talk to prize-winning poet Jenny Mitchell...
    3 months ago

Saturday, February 08, 2025

Saturday, February 08, 2025 11:03 am by Cristina in , , , , ,    No comments
The Saturday Paper is not much of a fan of Emma Rice's Wuthering Heights.
Anyone familiar with the source material – Emily Brontë’s iconic, heart-rending Gothic novel of the same name – could be forgiven for feeling a little confused. But the apron-wearing Hareton (Matthew Churcher), smiling at the audience like a cross between Martha Stewart and a Mills & Boon cover model, sums up the vibe of Rice’s ironic, tongue-in-cheek, folk-rock adaptation. [...]
Horrified, Rice wrote her Wuthering Heights in the style of a Greek tragedy, as a means of exploring the intergenerational consequences of abuse and xenophobia. In reality though, the production can’t escape its own self-aware humour and suffers from something of an identity crisis. It might as well be an ironic, thoroughly modern comedy right from the prologue when the hapless Mr Lockwood (the superb Sam Archer), in a coat-flapping display of slapstick, slams into Heathcliff’s front door.
The production is self-referential even in how it evokes its setting. Birds and butterflies are made of fluttering books on sticks, while the Wuthering Heights farmhouse is represented by a flat, front door and a window on castors (Vicki Mortimer’s set design). There is a hilarious literal depiction of the moor’s “screaming winds”. The Yorkshire Moors themselves are personified as a singing, dancing Greek chorus led by Nandi Bhebhe, wearing a brambly headdress and functioning as a sort of Mother Earth-meets-Oprah voice of conscience. She clucks consolingly as she dresses Heathcliff for Christmas, waving away his hesitations with a kindly wriggle of her patchwork bustle skirt (Mortimer’s costuming), reminding him that he must prove himself.
The chorus complains that there are too many characters with similar-sounding names, and other cast members helpfully walk on with chalkboards to clarify. The chalkboards make frequent reappearances, including when the town physician, Dr Kenneth (the delightful T. J. Holmes, also doubling as the band’s cellist), prances on stage in a top hat and rubber gloves to explain the spate of recent deaths among the main characters.
The childhood versions of Heathcliff, Hindley and Catherine are rendered as puppets (puppetry directed by John Leader), before growing into their adult human selves. There are no brooding eyes or pensive sighs from Stephanie Hockley’s energised, devilish Catherine. She’s a wild-haired, pouting teenager tottering around in platform heels, shrieking and grimacing like a poltergeist. In the production’s feted “drop mic” moment, an industrial floor fan is conspicuously placed in front of her so that she can wail into a microphone, hair blowing out, rockstar-style. It’s hard to understand exactly what Heathcliff sees in this Catherine, but perhaps it underscores the point of their lonely co-dependency.
The dandyish siblings Isabella Linton (Rebecca Collingwood) and her brother, Edgar (Archer again), are highlights, capering about in a froth of pink bows and lace. They don’t walk or dance normally like the rest of the cast but traverse the stage by twirling and leaping in an endless foppish ballet. Archer transitions gracefully between the whimsical humour of his character’s early scenes and the grieving, dying father that Edgar later becomes. Collingwood also takes on the role of Isabella’s son, the limp Little Linton, as a pants role. A talented comic artist, Collingwood has some of the best lines in the show: as Isabella she giggles, “I like to slide down the banister – because it tickles my tuppence!” and as Little Linton she harrumphs, “It’s pyjama time!”
As well as being puppetry director, Leader also stars as Heathcliff. A dark, menacing presence, out of all the cast he is the only character bereft of whimsy, tapping into the toxic cruelty so prevalent in Brontë’s novel. Heathcliff is also a vehicle for Rice’s message on racism: he has a strong Caribbean accent and prominent dreadlocks, and rages that his lot in life would be different if he’d been born with straight hair and fair skin. “Go back where you came from,” sneers Hindley (Churcher again) at Heathcliff, before striking him in the face.
It’s not the first time Heathcliff has been multiracially cast in a “race-lift” version of Wuthering Heights: see, for example, Andrea Arnold’s 2011 film version, starring James Howson as cinema’s first black Heathcliff.
Brontë’s descriptions of Heathcliff were purposely ambiguous. He was a “dark-skinned gypsy in aspect and a little lascar”, she wrote, referring to the older English word for sailors from India or South-East Asia. But the treatment of racism in Rice’s production takes the vague otherness of Brontë’s Heathcliff – subtle enough to have him adopted and loved by Mr Earnshaw but ambiguous enough to unsettle Yorkshire society – and repaints it in a thoroughly modern and somewhat ham-fisted take. Staking most of the exploration of racism in Leader’s accent and a few stock lines, it works at a superficial level. But this production steers clear of the deeper, gut-wrenching complexities of racism – whether in Brontë’s day or now – and Rice’s well-intentioned message begins to feel as two-dimensional as the cut-out set of Heathcliff’s front door.
Ultimately, as clever as the musical’s whimsy is, it causes the production to become tonally disjointed, which is made worse by a trying three-hour run time. There is only so much folk-rock (Ian Ross’s composition and songs, which seem strangely indistinguishable from each other) and ironic self-aware jokes the production can manage before it undermines the exploration into intergenerational trauma and racism that Rice intended. (Chantal Nguyen)
Wuthering Heights is one of '12 of the Most Unforgettable Books About Doomed Romances' according to Mental Floss.
Wuthering Heights by Emily Brontë (1847)
This is the sole novel by Emily Brontë, one of a remarkably talented trio of siblings alongside sisters Charlotte and Anne. Wuthering Heights contains all the classic elements of the doomed romance novel: forbidden love, awful misunderstandings, jealousy, revenge, and tragedy. It was initially published under the pseudonym Ellis Bell and caused quite a storm amongst contemporary critics thanks to the brutal actions and perceived inhumanity of its protagonists, Cathy and Heathcliff. Yet the strange and dark charm of the book was evident from the start, and it’s gone on to become one of the most revered tragic love stories of all time. Plus, there’s the little matter of Kate Bush’s enduring song and accompanying video. (Chris Wheatley)
According to The Bookseller
Layne Fargo’s The Favourites (Vintage), a reimagining of Wuthering Heights set in the world of professional ice dance, was also picked by [TikToker] Alice as one of the most popular new additions to the romance genre. Speaking on sports romances in an interview with The Bookseller, Fargo said: “To be an elite athlete you have to be so driven, so disciplined, so ambitious, and I think, in a lot of cases, there’s not really room for love or relationships. I see this a lot in sports romances where it’s like: ‘I can’t get involved with this person right now because I’m trying to make it to the Olympics, I’m trying to win the championship or whatever.’ So, that creates conflict right away.” (Katie Fraser)
The Atlantic features two memoirs about 'illness realism'.
Illness and literature have frequently been bedfellows. Tuberculosis, for example, shortened the life and influenced the work of authors as varied as Robert Louis Stevenson, Franz Kafka, and the Brontë sisters. (Boris Kachka)
A contributor to The Pitt News discusses reading classic novels.
In my junior year of high school, I made a far-too-long list of books I wanted to read before graduating. About 90% of the books on that list were classic novels written in the 19th century. I figured that reading as many books as I possibly could from authors like Jane Austen, the Brontë sisters, Charles Dickens and Leo Tolstoy would be well worth my time because it would mean I’d read a lot of “impressive” books. Honestly, I think my obsession with watching “Gilmore Girls” was probably a major reason why I was thinking that way. I figured that reading a large number of classic novels would make me appear as well read and school smart as Rory Gilmore.
I started with “Little Women” by Louisa May Alcott, then moved on to Charlotte Brontë’s “Jane Eyre.” I was relatively surprised by how much I enjoyed each of these books because I went into them assuming they would have boring plots and nearly impossible-to-understand language. Originally, when I thought about women in the 19th century, I imagined them to be people who never or rarely ever tried to defy societal expectations, especially those placed upon them by men. Reading stories about female characters in the 19th century written by women in the 19th century showed me how independent many women were at this time, despite the expectation that women prioritize marriage and motherhood over anything else. (Evin Verburgge)
A contributor to Gulf News claims that she's a 'love-agnostic'.
While my peers swooned over Danielle Steele’s passionate heroes, I was buried in crime fiction, far more invested in solving whodunnits than in romantic entanglements. While they dreamt of a brooding Mr. Darcy from Pride and Prejudice or a tormented Mr. Rochester from Jane Eyre, I admired the razor-sharp intellect of Agatha Christie’s Hercule Poirot and the cool, calculated moves of Mark Girland from James Hadley Chase’s thrillers. Looking back, that should have been a warning sign — but at the time, I was too engrossed in tracking fictional murderers to notice. (Krita Coelho)
We hope that's tongue-in-cheek because otherwise it's plain silly. It would amount to saying that people who read true crime are would-be murderers.

Another spot that needs saving from developers, as told by The Yorkshire Post:
A farmer and environmental campaigner has said a community’s drive to buy agricultural land on the edge of a village to prevent a potential housing development could become a template replicated across the country.
Farmer and Ouseburn division councillor Arnold Warneken was speaking after a public meeting at Great Ouseburn Village Hall near Boroughbridge heard a scheme backed by Dame Judi Dench to buy 20-acre Town End Field only had until February 28 to secure £300,000 to buy the land.
The beauty spot inspired a drawing by writer Anne Bronte when she worked as a governess for a family nearby and has attracted many visitors, including the father [somehow we don't think that Dame Judi Dench's father is still living] and brother of Dame Judi, who said the green space was "well worth saving". (Stuart Minting)

0 comments:

Post a Comment