Podcasts

  • With... Adam Sargant - It's our last episode of series 1!!! Expect ghost, ghouls and lots of laughs as we round off the series with Adam Sargant, AKA Haunted Haworth. We'll be...
    4 months ago

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Thursday, May 29, 2008 12:05 am by M. in , ,    2 comments
We have discovered via Becky's Book Reviews a new book by Clare B. Dunkle based on Wuthering Heights that will be published in 2010:
The House of Dead Maids (working title), a Wuthering Heights prequel which will probably be scheduled for early 2010.

Ginee Seo of Atheneum (Simon & Schuster) acquired The Sky Inside and The House of Dead Maids for her own imprint of Ginee Seo Books and asked me to write The Walls Have Eyes for her.
Becky's Book Reviews interviews the author and gives more information:
And I was very very intrigued to see that you’re working on a prequel for Wuthering Heights! Can you share any little tidbits—tease us a bit with what’s in store for readers—I must say I’d be eager to read both of those!

The Wuthering Heights prequel draft is done, and I think it horrified my editor when she got it—something like sending a rabid Chihuahua through the mail. It's based on a lifetime of mulling over that book; you might say its my own literary criticism of Emily Bronte's novel, but written in the form of another novel.

My take on Heathcliff is that he has no place in Wuthering Heights. He doesn't want to be there, nobody else wants him there, and aside from causing misery to everyone (including himself), he is largely powerless. Think about how the novel progresses: we're pretty sure Edgar would have married Cathy whether Heathcliff had come along or not, that she likely would have died having their first child, and that Cathy II and Hareton would have wound up engaged in order to unite the family fortunes. Heathcliff can't endure these turns of events, but they take place in spite of everything he does to prevent them. By the time Lockwood comes back to visit his landlord, Heathcliff has vanished from the book, leaving scarcely a trace.

For all Heathcliff's brilliance and ruthlessness, he can't change one bit of the plot. Clearly, then, he's a character who belongs in another story, a story where the ghostly and demonic forces that surround him make sense and where he can be who he really wants to be. I give the little boy Heathcliff that story in my prequel. And, just as an act of misplaced kindness at the beginning of Wuthering Heights delivers this imp into Emily Bronte's story, a similar act of misplaced kindness at the end of my book removes Heathcliff from his proper milieu and sets him on the path to Wuthering Heights.

Apparently, where Heathcliff is concerned, kindness doesn't pay. He never asks for it, and he certainly doesn't understand it.
Categories: , ,

2 comments:

  1. That's wrong, wrong, wrong. If I want a Wuthering Heights prequel or any other companion novel, I don't want somebody that's going to call Heathcliff "out of place" He and Catherine's love story is not to be criticized, and saying that Catherine would have felt the same way and done the same things had he not come is not my take on the story at all. Heathcliff is the greatest literary character of all time. He is NOT irrelevant, and of course he wants to be at Wuthering Heights. He wants to be wherever Catherine is....why else would it be called a love story?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you in that Heathcliff is totally irreplaceable. But what I think the author's saying is that the way she sees it the story could have unfolded just the same with or without Heathcliff. This is arguable, mainly because Hareton would have been evicted from Wuthering Heights when Hindley died or Isabella wouldn't have had his son. But I don't think she's exactly saying that Heathcliff is nothing to the book. (Am I making any sense at all?)

    At any rate, the fact that her book will tell Heathcliff's background prior to arriving in Wuthering Heights should mean that she is interested in him as a character.

    ReplyDelete